radiation protection in space
High-energy radiation poses a threat to astronauts, especially on long missions beyond the protection of Earth's magnetosphere. The greatest danger comes from two types of radiation: galactic cosmic rays (GCRs) and solar particle events (SPEs). These contain charged particles (mainly protons) that are trapped by Earth's magnetic field so that spacecraft in low Earth orbit, such as the Space Shuttle and International Space Station, are relatively well-protected. But the danger of radiation exposure is very real, for example, in the case of a manned mission to Mars.
GCRs are unpredictable, come from all directions, and may have extremely high energy. However, they tend to be few and far between, consisting of an occasional handful of very-high-speed particles arriving from some random direction. The danger they pose is one of cumulative radiation exposure over the duration of a long mission. An SPE, on the other hand, is quite capable of killing an unprotected person in a single burst. It is associated with the most violent of solar flares and produces X-rays (which reach Earth in minutes), energetic particles (hours), and solar plasma (days). Though the X-rays are certainly not benign, it is the high-energy particles – mostly protons and alpha particles – that are the main concern.
Fortunately, because solar activity is continuously monitored by a number of satellites, a couple of hours' advance warning of potential SPEs is possible. Also, once the particle bombardment starts it takes several hours to reach a peak before fading again. Not that this would have helped the Apollo astronauts once they were on their way to the Moon. The Apollo missions, being relatively brief, relied on the low probability of SPEs and had no extra shielding. By contrast, on a future Mars mission both a solar flare warning system and some form of radiation protection within the spacecraft will be an absolute necessity. The protection could take the form of a small shelter with radiation-resistant walls. However, this approach has limitations. For example, it is not effective against GCRs – in fact, unless the shelter is massive (in which case it places a heavy burden on the propulsion system) it is worse than no shielding at all because the impact of a GCR nucleus on a light shield would be to spawn secondary radiation more intense than the original. Since GCR cumulative doses on missions lasting more than a year may exceed the recommended maximum allowable whole-body radiation dose, mission designers are considering an alternative to the simple shelter in the form of an active electromagnetic shield. This could work like Earth's magnetic field, by bending the trajectory of incoming charged particles away from the region to be protected.
Related category SPACE AND AEROSPACE MEDICINE
Archived newsSuperflares could kill unprotected astronauts (Mar 21, 2005)
Home • About • Copyright © The Worlds of David Darling • Encyclopedia of Alternative Energy • Contact