Mascall, Eric Lionel (1905–1993)
Oxford lecturer in the philosophy of religion who rejected the notion that
a unique Earthly incarnation of Christ would be sufficient to redeem beings
on other worlds (see incarnation and redemption),
as proposed, for example, by Edward A. Milne. For
him, the significance of the incarnation of the Son of God on Earth was
restricted to Homo sapiens alone and not exportable. As for intelligent
creatures elsewhere, he cited the argument of Saint Thomas Aquinas
that the incarnation could have involved any one of the Trinity (God the
Son, the Father, or the Holy Ghost). Therefore, if such alternatives were
not theologically excluded on Earth, he reasoned, there should be no bar
to multiple incarnations throughout the Universe:1
It would be difficult to hold that the assumption by the
Son of the nature of one rational corporeal species involved the restoration
of other rational corporeal species ... The suggestion I wish to make
... is that there are no conclusive theological reasons for rejecting
the notion that, if there are, in some other part or parts of the universe,
rational corporeal beings who have sinned and are in need of redemption,
for those beings and for their salvation the Son of God has united (or
one day will unite) to his divine Person their nature, as he has united
it to ours ....
Related entry
Coyne, George
Related category
PHILOSOPHY
Also on this site: Encyclopedia
of Alternative Energy & Sustainable Living
Encyclopedia
of History
BACK TO TOP
|