comet Tempel 1 (9P/)
Comet Tempel 1 was the target for NASA's Deep Impact mission which successfully smashed a copper projectile into the comet's surface and observed the outcome of the impact from the flyby craft. On Feb 14, 2011, a second flyby of the comet was achieved, this time by the Stardust spacecraft, which re-examined the crater formed by the impactor.
What Deep Impact discoveredTempel 1 heats up and cool down rapidly, a thermal cycling that bakes the ices out of the material near the surface contributing somewhat to the comet's powdery consistency. Because large amounts of certain molecules appear in the gas ejected by the impactor's crash, it is suggested that the impact has excavated ices not normally boiled off into the coma and tail.
Solids entrained in the interior ice are swept out of Tempel 1 by the ices which are turning directly into gas. Some of these dust grains have enough momentum to carry them into the coma where they are swept away into the tail by the action of sunlight. Other grains with less energy fall back onto the surface of Tempel 1. This also contributes to the build up of powder on the surface.
Much more solid ejecta was expelled from the impact crater than astronomers expected. It is suspected that the dust is a silicate because the ejecta's cooling rate resembles that of liquid silica droplets.
The surface of Tempel 1 reveals an aging comet. There are a least three recognizable levels of topography that were probably not present when the comet formed. In the photo above is visible a smooth, relatively flat area, just below and to the left of center. The is bounded on its right edge by brightlines that are escarpments lit edge-on by the Sun. The scarps are about 20 meters high and at their foot there stretches away to the right a wishbone shaped lowland. In the lower part of the picture, you can see a couple of circular features. They are slightly darker than the surrounding material and, since they have a circular ridge, they are presumed to be impact craters.
Historical highlightsThe comet was well placed for its 1867 discovery thanks to its closest approach to Earth (0.568 AU) and its perihelion (1.562 AU), which occurred on May 15 and May 24, respectively. Over the next five months after its initial detection, subsequent observations were frequently made. The comet was last detected on Aug. 27, 1867 by Julius Schmidt, at which point the comet had become too faint for position measurements. At that time the comet was 1.30 AU from Earth and 1.81 AU from the Sun.
The comet was first recognized as periodic in May of 1867 when C. Bruhns of Leipzig determined the orbital period to be 5.74 years. By the time the final observations had been made of the 1867 apparition, the orbital period had been re-calculated to be 5.68 years.
The comet was recovered on Apr. 4, 1873 by E.J.M. Stephan of Marseille, France. The comet remained under observation until Jul. 1 of that year.
Predictions were made for an 1879 return, with the most ambitious being that of Raoul Gautier who computed definitive orbits from the two previous appearances before making his predictions for the upcoming return. Gautier's predictions enabled Tempel to recover the comet on Apr. 25, 1879. The comet was observed until its last detection on Jul. 8.
In 1881, comet Tempel 1 passed 0.55 AU from Jupiter. Due to gravitational interactions, the comet's orbital period was increased to 6.5 years and the perihelion distance was increased from 1.8 AU to 2.1 AU, making the comet an even fainter object. Subsequently, the comet was lost and it was not observed at its next expected return. Photographic attempts during 1898 and 1905 failed to recover the comet.
During 1963, B. G. Marsden conducted an investigation as to why comet Tempel 1 became lost. He found that further close approaches to Jupiter in 1941 (0.41 AU) and 1953 (0.77 AU) had decreased both the perihelion distance and the orbital period to values smaller than when the comet was initially discovered. These approaches moved Tempel 1 into its present libration around the 1:2 resonance with Jupiter. Subsequently, Marsden published predictions for the 1967 and 1972 returns in his paper "On the Orbits of Some Long Lost Comets."
Despite an unfavorable 1967 return, Elizabeth Roemer of the Catalina Observatory took several photographs during 1967. Her initial inspections of these photographs revealed nothing. However, in late 1968 she re-examined the photographic plates and found that a single exposure taken on Jun. 8, 1967 held the image of an 18th magnitude diffuse object very close to where Marsden had predicted the comet to be. Unfortunately, the single image did not provide definitive proof of the comet's recovery.
During 1972, Marsden's predictions allowed Roemer and L. M. Vaughn to recover the comet on January 11 from Steward Observatory. The comet became widely observed and reached a maximum brightness of magnitude 11 during May of that year. The comet was last seen on July 10. This apparition proved that the single image taken by Roemer in 1967 was indeed comet 9P/Tempel 1. Since that time the comet has been seen at every apparition. It will next return to perihelion in 2011.
Tempel 1 before its discoveryLong term integrations of comet 9P/Tempel 1's orbit suggest that the perihelion distance has been inside 10 AU for at least 300,000 years. The aphelion distance is much less well determined far in the past. The inclination of Tempel 1's orbit has remained low for as far into the past as the integrations have been calculated.
Related category COMETS
Home • About • Copyright © The Worlds of David Darling • Encyclopedia of Alternative Energy • Contact