martian fossils controversy
On August 7, 1996, a team of NASA scientists working at the NASA Johnson Space Center stunned the world by announcing that they had found evidence of past life on Mars.1 Spokesman David S. McKay reported at a press conference that the group had detected four distinct signatures of martian biology in the SNC meteorite designated ALH 84001, including:
The most dramatic claim centered on the purported fossils. Under a scanning electron microscope, these appear as elliptical, rope-like, and tubular structures in the carbonate rosettes, and are extraordinarily small. Each measures a mere 20 to 100 nanometers across and has only one thousandth the volume of the smallest known terrestrial bacteria. Despite the recent claim that "nanobes" have been found, it is far from clear if anything this tiny has ever lived on Earth or even that something so small could encapsulate the minimum biochemical machinery needed to sustain and replicate a living organism. Moreover, no independent analysis carried out since the original announcement has produced evidence that the structures in question are anything other than fragments of inorganic minerals or clay.
Concerning the carbonate rosettes, it was the contention of the NASA group that these were (1) formed on Mars (rather than on Earth after the meteorite's arrival), and (2) were deposited by liquid water which infiltrated the rock billions of years ago. A martian origin for the rosettes now seems beyond doubt, but controversy still surrounds the conditions under which the rosettes were laid down. In particular, there is strong evidence2 to suggest that the carbonate formations grew at temperatures of more than 650°C (1,200°F) which would rule out a biological explanation. On the other hand, a low-temperature, possibly bacterial origin for the structures has not yet been discounted.
In addition to the purported fossils, McKay and his co-workers described two other features in and near the rosettes which they believe formed biogenically in a watery environment: microscopic mineral grains and PAHs. Noting that some terrestrial bacteria manufacture iron sulfide and magnetite, they interpreted the crystals of these substances in ALH 84001 as products of martian microbial action. They conceded, however, that similar grains can result from by purely inorganic processes. An analysis conducted in 1973 showed that the sulfides in the meteorite are too rich in sulfur-34, a heavy isotope of the element, to have come from microbes like any seen on Earth. Moreover, the long chains of magnetite which are characteristic of known bacterial activity have not been reported, although magnetite crystals have been observed growing directly out of other minerals in the meteorite-proof that at least some of them arose through simple chemical means. There is also the difficulty in understanding what use magnetite would be to a martian organism, since Mars has virtually no magnetic field. Adrian J. Brearley of the University of New Mexico has suggested that a sharp blow to ALH 84001 (it is known to have suffered at least two) could have produced the effects seen by heating the rock to more than 550°C (1,020°F). This would have been sufficiently hot to break down the iron-rich carbonate into magnetite but leave the more thermally stable magnesium-rich cores intact. When the iron subsequently crystallized, it would have released carbon dioxide and created tiny voids around the magnetite grains, as observed.4
As for the PAHs, it is true that they could have come from decomposed martian microbes, particularly since the variety in the meteorite is unusual and very limited – just what would be expected, according to McKay and his group, of a biogenic origin. However, Edward Anders of the University of Chicago has shown how, given magnetite as a catalyst, such a blend could have come about inorganically. If it did, this would explain the discovery by Thomas Stephan and his colleagues at the University of Munster of PAHs all through the meteorite.5 The fact is that PAHs are not good biomarkers since they are so ubiquitous. For this reason, Jeffrey L. Bada and his colleagues, of the Scripps Institution in La Jolla, California, looked instead for amino acids in ALH 84001.6 Although he found some, they were present in virtually the same proportions as those in the Antarctic ice in which the meteorite had lain for 13,000 years, indicating extensive terrestrial contamination. If evidence for martian life is eventually found it will almost certainly have to come from elsewhere – probably samples obtained fresh from the surface or subsurface of Mars and analyzed in situ or following their return to Earth.
Archived newsUK researchers cast new doubt on Martian "fossils" (Aug 2, 2000)
Related entries Nakhla meteorite
Related categories MARS TOPICS
METEORS AND METEORITES
Home • About • Copyright © The Worlds of David Darling • Encyclopedia of Alternative Energy • Contact