life on Mars
With the arrival of the Curiosity rover on the Red Planet, the long-running saga of the hunt for life on Mars continues.
Given the ability of hardy microorganisms known as extremophiles to thrive in what appear to us to be very harsh conditions on Earth, the possibility of present-day martian microbes certainly can't be ruled out. Such creatures would most likely have evolved several billion years ago, when Mars was more similar in its climate to Earth, and then perhaps gradually adapted as the environment turned less friendly. In particular, microbial survivors on the Red Planet may have retreated underground where it is warmer, probably wetter, and better shielded from the Sun's harsh ultraviolet rays. The prospects for residual life on Mars appeared to have been raised by the announcement, in 2004, of the discovery by the Mars Express orbiter of trace amounts of methane (see Mars, methane on) and ammonia in the martian atmosphere.
Early speculationAlthough advocates of pluralism from the 17th century on had built a case for martian life on purely philosophical and theological grounds, it was William Herschel who first made astronomical observations of the planet that were detailed enough to be relevant to the debate. From his telescopic studies in 1783, Herschel concluded:1
The analogy between Mars and the earth is, perhaps, by far the greatest in the whole solar system. The diurnal motion is nearly the same; the obliquity of their respective ecliptics, on which the seasons depend, not very different; of all the superior planets the distance of Mars from the sun is by far the nearest alike to that of the earth ... If, then, we find that the globe we inhabit has its polar regions frozen and covered with mountains of ice and snow, that only partly melt when alternately exposed to the sun, I may well be permitted to surmise that the same causes may probably have the same effect on the globe of Mars ... I have often noticed occasional changes of partial bright belts ... and also once a darkish one, in a pretty high latitude... And these alterations we can hardly ascribe to any other cause than the variable disposition of clouds and vapors floating in the atmosphere of that planet.Writing in 1870, Richard Proctor2 took Herschel's Mars-Earth parallels further and argued vehemently for advanced martian life based on the assumption that Mars was well supplied with both water and atmosphere:
Shall we recognize in Mars all that makes our own world so well fitted for our wants – land and water, mountain and valley, cloud and sunshine, rain and ice, and snow, rivers and lakes, ocean currents and wind currents, without believing further in the existence of those forms of life without which all of these things would be wasted? ... it is yet to speculate ten thousand times more rashly to assert ... that Mars is a barren waste, either wholly untenanted by living creatures, or inhabited by beings belonging to the lowest orders of animated existence.The astronomical evidence seemed to continue to favor life following Giovanni Schiaparelli's announcement that he had seen regular linear markings on the surface, though no one could have imagined how far speculation over his canali would lead. By 1892, Camille Flammarion3 had leapt to the conclusion that:
[T]he present inhabitation of Mars by a race superior to ours is very probable... The considerable variations observed in the network of waterways testify that this planet is the seat of an energetic vitality ... [We] may hope that, because the world of Mars is older than ours, mankind there will be more advanced and wiser.In the fertile imagination of Percival Lowell, this portrait of an intelligently-populated planet attained its most elaborate form (see canals of Mars). Though Lowell's Mars was far less hospitable than Procter's, this was seen by him as no barrier to its habitation. On the contrary, the difficulties imposed by the environment had led the Martians to engage in such heroic hydrological schemes that evidence of them was visible from Earth. By the early years of the 20th century, professional opinion was shifting inexorably away from the notion of advanced life on Mars. Increasingly, Mars seemed too dry, airless, and cold to support anything more than primitive vegetation (see vegetation on Mars). Yet, as late as 1936, one of the founders of the British Interplanetary Society, felt able to write:4
On Mars, the crumbling remains of ancient civilizations may be found, mutely testifying to the one-time glory of a dying world.Indeed, in the very decade that the Space Age began, Willy Ley and Werner von Braun's The Exploration of Mars5 contained a haunting illustration by Chesley Bonestell of the ruins of a Martian temple. That dream, of finding the remnants of a long-dead race, quickly vanished as close-up pictures arrived in 1964 from the first successful Mars probe, Mariner 4, of a crater-strewn wilderness seemly not unlike that of our own Moon. However, in 1971, Mariner 9 brought renewed hope of finding past and even extant biological activity, with its images of what appeared to be dried-up river channels. Such was the revival of optimism that only a few weeks before the first Viking landing, Carl Sagan and Joshua Lederberg went so far as to suggest6 that: "Large organisms, possibly detectable by the Viking lander cameras, are not only possible on Mars; they may be favored." In the event, nothing so spectacular was found, although the Viking results are still open to a variety of interpretations, both chemical and biological. For more on the question of whether Viking found life or not, go here.
VikingThe Viking 1 and 2 landers are the only spacecraft to date to successfully land experiments on another world that were specifically designed to test for the presence of life. Their results were ambiguous and inconclusive. For more, see Viking's search for life on Mars.
Post-Viking developmentsThe discovery on Earth of a number of meteorites from Mars has opened up a couple of extraordinary possibilities. One is that some of these rocks actually contain evidence of past martian life in the form of fossils and biogenic chemical signatures (see martian "fossils" controversy). The other possibility, which remains valid whatever the final verdict on the fossils claim, is that microorganisms could travel between worlds aboard material shot into space during asteroid collisions. Life may have been seeded on Mars from Earth. Or, more extraordinarily, it has been suggested that life may have evolved first on Mars and then come to Earth by the process of ballistic panspermia.7 According to this idea, Mars afforded a safer haven for primitive life during the early, violent bombardment phase of the Solar System, between about 4.6 and 3.8 billion years ago. Whereas the Earth was probably hit repeatedly by objects up to 500 km across which would have vaporized the oceans and created a deadly steam atmosphere (see Earth, early conditions), fewer giant impacts would have taken place on Mars (because it is a smaller target) and the absence of large amounts of surface water would have saved the planet from being as severely steam-sterilized. Any martian thermophiles living just a few hundred meters below the surface, it has been suggested, would have been able to survive the trauma of collision with a 500-km-wide object. Furthermore, because of Mars' relatively cool interior and low gravity (allowing cracks, in which microbes could reside, to extend further down into the planet's interior) thermophilic subterranean organisms may have existed in a wide habitable zone extending to depths of several thousand meters. On Earth, by comparison, although thermophiles 1 km below the surface might have survived an ocean-boiling impact this would have left an uncomfortably narrow habitable zone – much below 1 km and microbes would probably be cooked by the planet's hot interior.8, 9
Curiosity rover and the search for lifeNASA's Curiosity rover which successfully landed in Gale Crater on Mars on August 5, 2012, will not search for life directly but carries the most capable package of instruments to date to look and test for signs of habitability – in the other words, the likelihood that Mars could support life, either in the past or still today. The rover is designed to spend at least two Earth-years exploring the ancient crater and an unusual, three-mile high mountain rising from its floor. Called Mount Sharp, this appears to be the remains of sediment that once filled the basin. As Curiosity roves up the sides of Mount Sharp, in the months to come, it will effectively journey through time to see how the environment in this region of Mars has changed over several billion years.
Archived newsEarly Mars 'too salty' for life (Feb 16, 2008)
Life on Mars: a definite possibility (Aug 31, 2004)
Methane on Mars: coverage continues (Mar 29, 2004)
Possible signs of life detected on Mars (Mar 28, 2004)
Life on Mars – but 'we sent it' (Mar 25, 2004)
Australian scientists, and their dog, say life once existed on Mars (Feb 1, 2004)
Bacteria found in 4,000 feet of rock hints at Mars life (Jan 1, 2004)
Where Mars life might be (May 24, 2003)
Martian biology in plain view? (Mar 28, 2003)
Martian meteorite positive life-signs? (Aug 4, 2002)
Chlorophyll detected at Mars Pathfinder landing site? (Apr 3, 2002)
Mystery spots deserve closer look (Mar 13, 2002)
Mars-like bugs on Earth (Jan 18, 2002)
Hungarian claims of vegetation on Mars (Sep 7, 2001)
Chris McKay of NASA Ames comments on the latest Mars life claims (Mar 1, 2001)
Life on Mars: skeptics remain unconvinced (Feb 28, 2001)
Case for biology on Mars grows (Feb 27, 2001)
Evidence for martian life conclusive, say researchers (Feb 26, 2001)
Related entry Viking's search for life on Mars
Related categories• ASTROBIOLOGY
• ALTERNATIVE FORMS OF LIFE
• MARS TOPICS
Home • About • Copyright © The Worlds of David Darling • Encyclopedia of Alternative Energy • Contact